About these ads

AFTER.LIFE

AFTER.LIFE-United States-2005

Christina Ricci as Anna Taylor

Justin Long as Paul Coleman

Liam Neeson as Eliot Deacon

Directed by Agnieszka Wojtowicz-Vosloo

Written by Agnieska Wojtowicz-Vosloo, Paul Vosloo and Jakub Korolczuk

Usually when I write a review I feel the need to add a nudge or a wink here and there to keep things on the light side. I don’t take myself too seriously because reviewing films is one of the few occasions that I can be myself and not have to feel angry about anything. Don’t misunderstand me; there are some films that anger me for their subject matter. You do recall that I tore apart a completely misogynistic film called “Broken” a while back. If it were up to me the makers of that garbage would be rotting in a cell. But wait, I am digressing as I am sometimes wont to do. Some films anger me, yes; but some just outright puzzle me. “After.Life” puzzled me.

Anna Taylor (Christina Ricci-”Monster”, “Black Snake Moan“) is in an auto accident and wakes up in a funeral home. Eliot Deacon, (Liam Neeson-”The Grey”) the funeral director, tells her that she is dead; that there is no air passing through her lungs and that she is already beginning to decompose. Funny, last time I noticed the dead don’t talk and they sure as hell don’t move. This is where the confusion sets in. Throughout the entire film we are never completely sure if Anna is indeed dead or there is something far more sinister to Eliot Deacon. Does he have the gift of speaking with the dead; or are they only dead after he is finished with them? Then there’s the matter of Anna’s boyfriend Paul (Justin Long). Does he believe that Anna is alive? What about the phone call he receives from her? While I’m going strong I might as well mention Jack (Chandler Canterbury), an 11 year-old boy with an attraction to the deceased. Does he see Anna? What is his connection to her? What is his connection to Eliot Deacon? I don’t like watching a film and not having at least some of the answers. “After.Life” holds its cards close to the chest. It never clues us in on what it’s trying to tell us. Are people more afraid of living than they are of dying? We use the expression that someone “doesn’t deserve to live”. Should it be that they don’t deserve to die as if death were the honor? Questions, questions, and more questions; if I keep asking questions I will slowly go insane. I guess it’s like the great but not yet late Tom Waits said:

What does it matter, a dream of love
Or a dream of lies
We’re all gonna be the same place
When we die
Your spirit don’t leave knowing
Your face or your name
And the wind through your bones
Is all that remains
And we’re all gonna be
Just dirt on the ground.

A story comes to mind about a man who was reading the paper one day. As he glances at the obituaries what do his eyes come across but his very own death notice. He calls the newspaper; “You’re newspaper reports me as being dead. I’m not dead.” The woman on the end asks him, “Sir, where are you calling from?”

Ba-dum-bum!!

TRIVIA

Kate Bosworth was originally cast as Anna but was replaced by Christina Ricci.

The prop knife used by Anna (Christina Ricci) is the same one used by Alex (Glenn Close) in Fatal Attraction.

Alfred Molina was originally cast as Eliot but was replaced by Liam Neeson.

½

About these ads

About jmount43

I was born in Spartanburg, South Carolina on March 4, 1962. I guess that makes me old, but I certainly don't feel that way. I still play video games and listen to rock and roll music. I love movies, especially horror films. I have a beautiful wife who is my all time best friend. She supports me in everything I do. More importantly, she calls me out on my bullshit. This blog is dedicated to her for everything she's done for me.

Posted on 07/02/2012, in Films about Death, Films Released in 2009, Ghost Films, Movies and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. I love the people who comment on your comments. Wonderful and funny. Boys will be boys!

  2. This sounds like a frustrating watch. I think I would skip this one because I tend to get angry at films that raise a bunch of questions with no regard to filling the audience in. I can’t tell if the writer(s) think they are being smart or if they are too stupid to figure out their own story.

    Also, what a horrendous photoshop job on Liam Neeson for the cover.

  3. I had never heard of this movie. It sounds like a bit of a confusing one, but at the same time I now find myself drawn to watching it.
    As Mike says, Christina Ricci is always worth the time.

  4. A fairly good film, average I’d say. And oh, you get to see Christina Ricci naked which is always a plus :-)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,626 other followers

%d bloggers like this: